Article 34/35 - Individual applications and Admissibility criteria
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Cases selected for updating the Case-Law Guide.
Kurkut and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 58901/19 and 6 others
Article 35: exhaustion of domestic remedies where the relevant administrative court had made a clear procedural error for which the applicant could not be reproached.
Judgment
Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18
Article 35: Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis with respect to acts or omissions of a respondent State that has ceased to be a Contracting Party to the Convention.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Varyan v. Armenia, no. 48998/14
Article 35: respondent State estopped from raising plea of non-exhaustion in view of failure to raise preliminary objection in initial observations.
Judgment
Key Themes
Annotated case-lists on a subject of relevance to this Article.
Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
- Representation of the child before the ECHR (Article 8)
Useful Materials
Selected case-law materials concerning this Article.
Useful Links
Links to selected websites of relevance to this Article.