Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Cases selected for updating the Case-Law Guide.
Ioannides v. Cyprus, no. 32879/18
Lack of access to property located in the buffer zone and occupation of the applicant’s house by the UN Peacekeeping Force, based on the respondent State’s authorisation, and the latter’s refusal to pay her any rent in that respect.
Judgment
UAB Profarma and UAB Bona Diagnosis v. Lithuania, nos. 46264/22 and 50184/22
Annulment of contracts between private companies and the State for the purchase of COVID-19 tests, and restitution by the companies of a substantial part of the sum received, which the State had overpaid.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Amerisoc Center S.R.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 50527/20
Lack of remedy by which to meaningfully challenge seizure of the applicant company’s Luxembourg bank assets following an international request for assistance by Peru as part of money-laundering proceedings.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Key Themes
Annotated case-lists on a subject of relevance to this Article.
Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
Useful Materials
Selected case-law materials concerning this Article
- Protection of property (no. CDH(76)36)
Useful Links
Links to selected websites of relevance to this Article.