Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Cases selected for updating the Case-Law Guide.
Amerisoc Center S.R.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 50527/20
Lack of remedy by which to meaningfully challenge seizure of the applicant company’s Luxembourg bank assets following an international request for assistance by Peru as part of money-laundering proceedings.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Immoreks Makedonija Doo Skopje v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 25311/17
Incompatibility ratione materiae (for lack of “legitimate expectation”) of complaint about domestic tax authorities’ refusal to deduct input Value-Added Tax previously paid by the applicant company to its suppliers.
Decision
Mandev and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 57002/11 and 4 others
Excessive court fees for lodging appeals in forfeiture proceedings.
Judgment
Key Themes
Annotated case-lists on a subject of relevance to this Article.
Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
Useful Materials
Selected case-law materials concerning this Article.
- Protection of property (no. CDH(76)36)
Useful Links
Links to selected websites of relevance to this Article.