Article 34/35 - Individual applications and Admissibility criteria
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Yasak v. Türkiye [GC], no. 17389/20
Article 35: conviction for membership in an armed terrorist organisation, without an individualised and contextual assessment of the applicant’s mens rea, and conditions of detention in prison.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Ukrayinskyy and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 48751/19 and 41 others
Article 34: prison officials’ questioning of the applicants about their applications pending before the Court and the compelling of some of them to give oral or written statements.
Judgment
B.G. v. France, no. 70945/17
Article 35: failure to comply with the fair-trial guarantees in the context of a warning issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office to the applicant and characterising her as the “perpetrator” of a false accusation of rape, following discontinuation of her own criminal complaint.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Key Themes

Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
- Representation of the child before the ECHR (Article 8)
Useful Materials

Useful Links


