Article 34/35 - Individual applications and Admissibility criteria
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Cangı and Others v. Türkiye (no. 2), no. 65087/19
Article 35: reasoning of the domestic courts with respect to the applicants’ objections concerning (a) the assessment of the court-appointed expert panel and (b) the Constitutional Court’s approach in examining the applicants’ individual application with respect to the environmental impact of a mine.
Judgment
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Türkiye (no. 4), no. 13609/20
Article 35: applicant’s renewed pre-trial detention on remand, which commenced before the Court’s Grand Chamber rendered its judgment concerning the applicant’s preceding detention, for acts related to the “6-8 October 2014 events”.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Mamaladze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5855/23
Article 34: alleged breach of the applicant’s right of individual application, as the applicant had developed a belief – following the dissemination of thousands of files allegedly intercepted from the State Security Service – that his conversations with his representative were being listened to while proceedings in respect of his substantive complaints under the Convention were pending before the Court.
Decision
Key Themes
Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
- Representation of the child before the ECHR (Article 8)