Article 34/35 - Individual applications and Admissibility criteria
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Cases selected for updating the Case-Law Guide.
Denysyuk and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 22790/19 and 3 others
Article 38: inferences drawn by the Court due to government’s refusal to submit requested documents.
Judgment
Cannavacciuolo and Others v. Italy, nos. 51567/14 and 3 others
Article 34: applicant associations not “directly affected”, thus lacking standing/victim status in accordance with the established case-law, since the approach taken in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland is limited to the context of climate change.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Taganova and Others v. Georgia and Russia, nos. 18102/04 and 4 others
Article 35: complaints regarding property destroyed before the ratification of the Convention by the respondent State found to be incompatible ratione temporis; lack of access to property, over which the applicants had prima facie kept legal ownership, defined as a continuing situation falling within Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis.
Judgment
Key Themes
Annotated case-lists on a subject of relevance to this Article.
Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
- Representation of the child before the ECHR (Article 8)
Useful Materials
Selected case-law materials concerning this Article.
Useful Links
Links to selected websites of relevance to this Article.