Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
Case-Law Guide
Article Updates
Strashunskyy v. Ukraine, no. 6522/19
Multiple injuries sustained by the applicant, suffering from a mental health condition, inflicted by staff of the State-run Boarding House for Disabled and Elderly People he was residing in, during his forced hospitalisation.
Judgment
Asciutto and Others v. Italy, nos. 23169/16 and 3 others
Application to the applicants of the irreducible ergastolo ostativo life imprisonment regime under the 1992 version of section 4 bis of the Prison Administration Act, according to which prisoners convicted for mafia-related crimes who refused to cooperate with the judicial authorities were not entitled to parole.
Judgment
Kavala v. Türkiye (no. 2) [GC], no. 2170/24
Criminal conviction of the applicant, a businessman and human rights defender, relating to his involvement in the Gezi Park events, and continued detention of the applicant, contrary to the Court’s two previous judgments in this matter.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Key Themes

Related Key Theme(s) from other Article / Transversal Theme pages
- Detention of migrant children (Immigration)
- Discrimination through violence (Article 14)
- Domestic violence (Article 2)
- Health and immigration (Immigration)
Useful Materials

- Prohibition of torture (no. CDH(77)3)
- Prohibition of torture (no. CDH(70)9)
- Prohibition of torture (no. DH(56)5)
Useful Links


