Article 35: alleged interference, i.e. irrevocable loss of ownership of a contested plot of land, resulting from a final judgment of the Court of Cassation delivered in 2019, as opposed to a Decree enacted in 1955 that stipulated the transfer of the plot to the Greek State.
Judgment

Article 35: complaint about lawfulness and conditions of a Tunisian national’s confinement on board the ship used to return him to Tunisia on the basis of an order refusing him entry to Italy.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 34: alleged pressure exerted by the authorities on the applicant to withdraw his application to the Court.
Judgment

Article 35: interpretation of the exceptional measures in view of the global COVID-19 pandemic (namely suspension of the six-month time limit of Article 35 § 1) in a case where the time-limit had neither started to run nor expired during the period of suspension between 16 March and 15 June 2020.
Decision

Article 35: applicant’s non-disclosure, after filing a complaint about his expulsion from university and alleged inability to enrol elsewhere, of his re-enrolment and completion of studies at another university.
Decision

Article 34: victim status of the stepmother, stepmother’s brother and half-brother’s partner of a prisoner on the run who was killed during an operation to arrest him. 
Judgment

Article 35 § 1: compliance with the time limit where the final court decisions are not served on or sent to the parties by the court.
Judgment

Article 35 § 1: compliance with the obligation to exhaust domestic remedies by bringing civil proceedings instead of a criminal complaint, the first being, in the light of the specific circumstances of the case, the only fact-finding judicial forum for the establishment of any liability in the context of effective protection of the applicant against sexual abuse.
Judgment

Article 35: effectiveness of a civil remedy to complain that the domestic authorities had failed to protect the applicant, a woman with intellectual disabilities, against ill-treatment and forced labour during her placement with a family on a farm.
Judgment

Article 34: standing of heirs of applicants, who passed away prior to the delivery of the principal judgment, of which the Court was informed afterwards.
Judgment

Article 38: inferences drawn by the Court due to government’s refusal to submit requested documents.
Judgment

Article 35: effectiveness of new ordinary domestic remedy in respect of a compensation claim for land initially expropriated in 1977, the domestic courts having yet to establish a stable practice of application.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 34: applicant associations not “directly affected”, thus lacking standing/victim status in accordance with the established case-law, since the approach taken in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland is limited to the context of climate change.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: effectiveness of an appeal on points of law in the Romanian legal system concerning a complaint about the taking of evidence in a criminal case.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 35: complaints regarding property destroyed before the ratification of the Convention by the respondent State found to be incompatible ratione temporis; lack of access to property, over which the applicants had prima facie kept legal ownership, defined as a continuing situation falling within Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis.
Judgment

Article 35: failure to exhaust available and effective domestic remedies with respect to alleged violations stemming from statute that allows for discretion in its implementation.
Judgment

Article 34: the first applicant’s locus standi to apply on behalf of her mother, the second applicant, confirmed the two Lambert criteria: (a) the risk that the direct victim would otherwise be deprived of effective protection of her rights, (b) and the absence of a conflict of interests between the victim and the applicant.
Judgment

Article 35: applicant’s decision to lodge the application with the Court while the proceedings were still pending before the competent supervisory court was justified due to the uncertainty as to whether his case would be considered promptly in view of suspensions and delays at that court at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Judgment

Article 34: State’s failure to comply with initial interim measures and excessively long delays in complying with modified interim measures.
Judgment

Article 34: standing of a non-governmental organisation to lodge an application on behalf of a person with a severe intellectual disability who died in a State-run social care home.
Judgment

Article 57: reservation made by Portugal concerning Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 invalid because the requirement of Article 57 § 2 has not been met (i.e. reservation lacks brief statement of the law concerned).
Judgment

Article 35: neither the fact that the applicants lived outside France nor the fact that they had not freely chosen to come under the respondent State’s jurisdiction exempted them from their duty to exhaust the available and presumably effective domestic remedies in France.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 35: application tainted by the applicants’ manipulation, through bribes, of the domestic justice system. Abuse of the right of application.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 35: exhaustion of domestic remedies where the relevant administrative court had made a clear procedural error for which the applicant could not be reproached.
Judgment

Article 35: Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis with respect to acts or omissions of a respondent State that has ceased to be a Contracting Party to the Convention.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: delay of more than two weeks to dispatch the application to the Court afresh after becoming aware of a problem with postal services.
Decision

Article 35: respondent State estopped from raising plea of non-exhaustion in view of failure to raise preliminary objection in initial observations.
Judgment

Article 34: applicant trust sufficiently affected by a confiscation order despite it not being enforced yet.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: exhaustion of domestic remedies on the basis of a general provision providing a judicial remedy but in the absence of domestic case-law to that effect.
Judgment

Article 34: lack of sufficient action to mitigate climate change – the victim status of an individual.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 35: exhaustion of domestic remedies in the context of climate change.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 34: lack of sufficient action to mitigate effects of climate change - locus standi of an association of older women concerned about the consequences of global warming and victim status of four individual women.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: first application of the “no-significant disadvantage” criterion with respect to Article 11.
Decision

Article 35: application of the six-month rule to reopened criminal proceedings.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: failure to lodge a civil claim to obtain redress for an alleged breach of the presumption of innocence by public officials’ statements. Exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Judgment

Article 34 and 35 § 1: unjustified abandonment by the applicant association of an application for holding a public event in view of a Covid-19 related ban; victim status and compliance with the exhaustion requirement.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 34: existence of exceptional circumstances allowing applicants to lodge the application, without written authority, in the name and on behalf of their vulnerable son, with mental health issues and in detention. Locus standi.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 34: lack of exceptional circumstances allowing applicants to lodge the application in the name and on behalf of their partners without written authority. Locus standi.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 34: victim status retained but matter resolved following the annulment of the applicants' criminal convictions, their acquittal and compensation.
Decision

Article 34: locus standi of a relative to act on behalf of an elderly person under legal protection.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 35: scope of "the rights and responsibilities of a private law character" for the purpose of the applicability of Article 5 of Protocol No. 7. Compatibility ratione materiae.
Decision

Article 35: Inter-state arbitration proceedings under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea do not constitute "another procedure of international investigation or settlement".
Judgment

Article 34: applicant suffering directly from the consequences of the legal provision at stake by the mere fact that she belonged to the category of divorced women likely to remarry. Victim status.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Article 34: acknowledgment of a responsibility and ex gratia awards made to the applicants for the killing of their relative by a non-State actor. Loss of victim status.
Decision

Article 37: examination of the case despite the applicant's lack of contact with her representative.
Judgment

Article 35: dies a quo in the context of a recusal request. Six-months.
Judgment

Article 35: limits of the Court’s jurisdiction with respect to acts or omissions spanning across the date on which a respondent State ceased to be a Party to the Convention.
Decision | Legal Summary

Article 35: access to court and the requirement to exhaust domestic remedies.
Judgment | Legal Summary

Articles 34 and 35: distinction between complaints and secondary arguments and the consequent delimiting of the Court’s ability to recharacterise a complaint.
Judgment | Legal Summary 

Article 34: in abstracto complaints without convincing evidence that applicants at real risk of being directly affected by amendments effectively banning access to legal abortion on foetal malformation grounds. Victim status.
Decision | Legal Summary