Articolul 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietății
Ghid privind jurisprudența
Actualizări de articole
Cauze selectate pentru actualizarea Ghidului privind jurisprudența.
Amerisoc Center S.R.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 50527/20
Lack of remedy by which to meaningfully challenge seizure of the applicant company’s Luxembourg bank assets following an international request for assistance by Peru as part of money-laundering proceedings.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Immoreks Makedonija Doo Skopje v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 25311/17
Incompatibility ratione materiae (for lack of “legitimate expectation”) of complaint about domestic tax authorities’ refusal to deduct input Value-Added Tax previously paid by the applicant company to its suppliers.
Decision
Mandev and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 57002/11 and 4 others
Excessive court fees for lodging appeals in forfeiture proceedings.
Judgment
Teme-cheie
Liste de cauze adnotate pe un subiect relevant pentru acest articol.
Temă(e)-cheie conexă(e) din alte pagini de articole / teme transversale
Materiale utile
Selecție de materiale de jurisprudență privind acest articol.
- Protection of property (no. CDH(76)36)
Linkuri utile
Selecție de site-uri web privind jurisprudența Curții.