Articolul 34/35 - Cereri individuale și condiții de admisibilitate
Ghid privind jurisprudența
Actualizări la articole
Cangı and Others v. Türkiye (no. 2), no. 65087/19
Article 35: reasoning of the domestic courts with respect to the applicants’ objections concerning (a) the assessment of the court-appointed expert panel and (b) the Constitutional Court’s approach in examining the applicants’ individual application with respect to the environmental impact of a mine.
Judgment
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Türkiye (no. 4), no. 13609/20
Article 35: applicant’s renewed pre-trial detention on remand, which commenced before the Court’s Grand Chamber rendered its judgment concerning the applicant’s preceding detention, for acts related to the “6-8 October 2014 events”.
Judgment | Legal Summary
Mamaladze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5855/23
Article 34: alleged breach of the applicant’s right of individual application, as the applicant had developed a belief – following the dissemination of thousands of files allegedly intercepted from the State Security Service – that his conversations with his representative were being listened to while proceedings in respect of his substantive complaints under the Convention were pending before the Court.
Decision
Teme-cheie
Teme-cheie conexe din alte pagini de articole / teme transversale
- Reprezentarea copilului în fața CEDO (Art. 8)